Is There a ‘Bad Science’?

Should we clone human beings? Should we research into immortality? Will that be a right thing to do?  Was inventing morphine a bad thing? What about invention of computers, television, internet, rockets, sleeping pills etc.? How about discovery of radioactivity? In fact, about any scientific discovery or invention.

For example, did the inventor of television ever think about the social impact it will have? Did he consider the time-wasting capability of this device? How about the guy who came up with the cigarettes and tobacco? Did he consider that he was inventing new ways for people to die? Can we argue in the hindsight: if it was a good idea to invent such a thing? Did the guy who invented computers consider the disruptive nature of this device in the job market? Did the inventers think about any ethical issues associated with their inventions and discoveries? Even more fundamental question is: if they should have considered the side effects of these inventions. Even if they did, could they possibly ‘uninvent’ or ‘un-discover’ something?

How about the new inventions and discoveries? Should we be thinking about their possible destructive power and the evil they will spread just like the atomic bomb and tobacco? Is it even possible not to invent stuff? Is it possible to not look into a possible discovery with its negative impact in mind? It might be possible for one particular scientist and engineer to do that but how about the whole world? Perhaps though legislation? If something is there to be invented or discovered, it is just the matter of time before it is revealed. But even if we could stop people from inventing certain technologies, should we stop them? Let us look at the history.

Almost all the inventions made by humans were made either based on pure curiosity or with good intentions in mind. Almost all of them have made our lives easy in some way. However, their destructive power cannot be ignored. Radioactivity and the nuclear bomb, rockets and missiles, sleeping pills and depression are all examples. However, one thing common in all of them is that they are good in good hands and pure evil in the wrong hands. It has nothing to do with the technology or science. We are all born with hands. It is entirely up to us to choose how we use them. The same hands can be used to help or to deliver a punch to someone. Just like the hands, almost all of the inventions made are not good or evil. Their final output completely depends on the purpose they are used for. Greed is the driver for most of the bad use of science. Greed for wealth lead to pharmaceutical companies making people drug addicts. Hunger for power lead to arms races across the globe. Control measures need, therefore, to be applied on greed and criminal use of science. Not on science itself.

The same can be argued for the inventions of postnormal times. Robotics and automation can be a force for good. It can help us improve our lives and make this world a happier, safer more peaceful place. But they can also lead to our downfall if their destructive power is unleashed and greed takes over. The job-killing capability of these technologies can be overcome by a fairer distribution of benefits from these technologies considering that the whole humanity has contributed to the realization of these technologies.

There is, apparently, no bad science. Only the wrong type of people. Keep inventing!

Naeem Minhas

Comments

  1. Thompson Smith11 July 2018 at 03:25

    Thank you. You have posted such a wonderful article. I admire the way you conveying the information. To know more detail about is it illegal to buy zopiclone online contact us.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Our Education System Needs a Grand Revival

First it was Greeks and then the Romans. Islamic civilization took their work and passed it onto the West with plenty of additions of their own. Chinese and African civilizations also had their heydays in the past. So, the industrial revolution was as a result of collective efforts of almost the whole humanity until that time.
The enablers of the scientific thought and discoveries were the men and women of intellect who had been educated, trained and taught to think differently and creatively. Whichever civilization and society allowed, invested and made a culture of critical thinking and analysis became the front runner in the path of knowledge and discovery. Education was the key. And it will remain so for further growth and development.
Now if we look at it in the context of today’s scientific and industrial advancements with all the buzz around Industry 4.0, one can wonder if our education systems are good enough. What is it that we should be learning/teaching and how?
Most of our c…
Read more

A Viral Epidemic in Waiting and How to Avert It: Embracing Materials Virology

The flu vaccine this year in the US has only been 36% effective, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), with several thousand human fatalities reported so far. US is going through one of its worst flu seasons in recent times. The devil is the dreaded flu strain, H3N2.
Influenza claims 290000 to 650000 human lives worldwide annually (World Health Organization). Flu vaccines are modified each year according to strain predictions. Defense mechanism in the strains can, however, overcome these vaccines. In general, influenza viruses have high mutation rates, a fact that has, so far, kept the arrival of a universal flu vaccine at bay.
If the above does not scare you (I am sure it does!), let us talk about ‘zombie pathogens’. Imagine giant, complex viruses that thrived freely on life forms several thousands of years ago, but have been hibernating ever since in the polar caps. Modern lifeforms, including us, have not interacted with these pathogens leaving us wit…
Read more

Is Social Media Destroying Society?

I come from India. Decades ago, the Indian village life and culture was characterized by the simple and meek village folk gathering around a banyan tree, of which every village would proudly boast of, and discuss ‘global’ matters. The matters would encircle the local agriculture, the overall village health, neighbors, families, politics, and the like. These sittings, or ‘panchayats’ as they were called, had a social aspect. One could often see the village folk behaving and acting as a cumulative whole, as a well-knit extended family. The discussions though often lacked the bigger picture: what were the latest trends in science and technology and what was new in geopolitics?
Things soon began to change with the younger generations seeking greener pastures and leaking into the adjoining cities. Globalization further punctured the village borders. Younger generation soon found itself at crossroads: one path led to the ancestral lands, memories and culture that shaped and molded it; the…
Read more